- From: 一丝 <yiorsi@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:16:08 +0800
- To: Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CA+-d5ZoX8NEP+4qgWSY2uP_-KOZzVo7Byga-ofR==CcNaOSi9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Webkit in this specification if you want to continue experiencing what is wrong? SVG is the problem? For pictures responsive This is a useful feature. 以上 一丝 2013/6/12 Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com> > Any feedback? Apple? Microsoft? Mozilla? > > Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com> writes: > > > Hello, > > > > I'm considering implementing object-fit [1] and object-position [2] in > > Blink, and would like to hear other vendors' opinions on supporting > > these properties, most importantly to figure out if anyone is negative, > > but also to learn about any plans to implement them. As far as I know, > > these properties are currently only supported in Presto, where it's -o- > > prefixed, and it's also using an older version (working draft or even > > editor's draft - not sure) of the spec. The spec has reached CR by now, > > though. > > > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/CR-css3-images-20120417/#the-object-fit > > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-images/#the-object-position > > > > What I've found: > > > > Apple: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52040 (object-fit only), > > stuck in code review and Mac testing. > > > > Microsoft: No info. > > > > Mozilla: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624647 (object-fit > > only), no progress. > > -- > ---- Morten Stenshorne, developer, Opera Software ASA ---- > ---- Office: +47 23692400 ------ Mobile: +47 93440112 ---- > ------------------ http://www.opera.com/ ----------------- > >
Received on Thursday, 13 June 2013 04:16:55 UTC