RE: [css-regions] Editorial comment on content chain order

> What about:
> ---
> it becomes a sibling of that ancestor,
> following the ancestor along with
> any other nodes in this situation
> in DOM order.
> ---

Seems good to me. I would probably say "following directly" to make it clear they're siblings of the ancestor before any other element, but I think it's fine.

> We could instead say that
> ---
> The descendants of an element or content with
> a specified flow may themselves have a
> specified flow. If an element or content
> has the same specified flow as one of its
> ancestors, it moves to the named flow in
> place in DOM order within its ancestor.
> ---

Not a big fan of that one. It's not obvious how you can actually know that it's the case and it doesn't help to solve the case where you have

Received on Thursday, 25 July 2013 22:07:10 UTC