- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 20:26:41 -0700
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Cameron McCormack: >>> I don't think we need the custom versions of has, set and delete. The >>> default versions of these should be fine. > > > Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >> You don't even need to define get(), do you? The default operation of >> that (defined in terms of the map entries) should be sufficient. > > > I mistyped; meant to say that you don't need get, has and delete, but will > need get if you are doing some checking of feature names/values. Heh, another mistype. s/but will need get/but will need set/ ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 03:27:28 UTC