On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > Cameron McCormack: >>> I don't think we need the custom versions of has, set and delete. The >>> default versions of these should be fine. > > > Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >> You don't even need to define get(), do you? The default operation of >> that (defined in terms of the map entries) should be sufficient. > > > I mistyped; meant to say that you don't need get, has and delete, but will > need get if you are doing some checking of feature names/values. Heh, another mistype. s/but will need get/but will need set/ ~TJReceived on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 03:27:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:29 UTC