On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote: > >> Mandatory bikeshed: "display-optionality" is a horrible name :-) >> > > I agree that it's somewhat awkward-sounding; suggestions for better names > welcome :-) > visibility: optional? I'm still not convinced this is useful enough to be worth implementing, but I think you should go ahead if you need to. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * *Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 02:38:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:32 UTC