W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2013

Re: [css-display]? Compositing, expensive things, and laziness

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 14:38:33 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLb-hfR-x+cH8rPbj8SCRq_uejfFknwHxvS9ZT0z40bgyg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:
>
>> Mandatory bikeshed: "display-optionality" is a horrible name :-)
>>
>
> I agree that it's somewhat awkward-sounding; suggestions for better names
> welcome :-)
>

visibility: optional?

I'm still not convinced this is useful enough to be worth implementing, but
I think you should go ahead if you need to.

Rob
-- 
Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
*
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 02:38:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:32 UTC