W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2013

Re: [css-display]? Compositing, expensive things, and laziness

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 14:38:33 +1200
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLb-hfR-x+cH8rPbj8SCRq_uejfFknwHxvS9ZT0z40bgyg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Ali Juma <ajuma@chromium.org> wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 10:44 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>wrote:
>> Mandatory bikeshed: "display-optionality" is a horrible name :-)
> I agree that it's somewhat awkward-sounding; suggestions for better names
> welcome :-)

visibility: optional?

I'm still not convinced this is useful enough to be worth implementing, but
I think you should go ahead if you need to.

Jtehsauts  tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy  Mdaon  yhoaus  eanuttehrotraiitny  eovni
le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o  Whhei csha iids  teoa
stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d  'mYaonu,r  "sGients  uapr,e  tfaokreg iyvoeunr,
'm aotr  atnod  sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t"  uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n?  gBoutt  uIp
waanndt  wyeonut  thoo mken.o w  *
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 02:38:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:32 UTC