- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 09:03:30 +1000
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Cameron McCormack: >> I don't think we need the custom versions of has, set and delete. The >> default versions of these should be fine. Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > You don't even need to define get(), do you? The default operation of > that (defined in terms of the map entries) should be sufficient. I mistyped; meant to say that you don't need get, has and delete, but will need get if you are doing some checking of feature names/values.
Received on Tuesday, 2 July 2013 23:04:10 UTC