Re: [css3-syntax] Separation of concerns: "declaration/rule-filled", "can be made important" from Simon Sapin on 2013-01-30 (www-style@w3.org from January 2013)

From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 08:27:42 +0100
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <5108CB6E.30807@kozea.fr>

Le 30/01/2013 05:49, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit :
> I've now done this.  The Parser intro says that the parser must be
> provided with a list of "recognized at-rules", which contains whether
> the names of at-rules and whether they're rule-filled,
> declaration-filled, or neither.

Should we have a less contextual name for "neither"? I just named an 
enumerator NotFilled in an implementation, but I don’t like it.

-- 
Simon Sapin

Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 07:28:05 UTC