Re: [css3-syntax] Separation of concerns: "declaration/rule-filled", "can be made important" from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2013-01-30 (www-style@w3.org from January 2013)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 01:43:53 -0800
To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDA2_TdUZ8aAK9uMs5s6eSud3wB779YdBRF-UkDSAJ1Dcg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote:
> Le 30/01/2013 05:49, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit :
>> I've now done this.  The Parser intro says that the parser must be
>> provided with a list of "recognized at-rules", which contains whether
>> the names of at-rules and whether they're rule-filled,
>> declaration-filled, or neither.
>
> Should we have a less contextual name for "neither"? I just named an
> enumerator NotFilled in an implementation, but I don’t like it.

If you'd like one, I suggest "statement" or "statement at-rule".

~TJ

Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 09:44:41 UTC