- From: Sylvain Galineau <galineau@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 10:19:25 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Lea Verou <lea@verou.me>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 12/3/13 10:55 AM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:44 AM, Lea Verou <lea@verou.me> wrote: >> On Dec 3, 2013, at 00:39, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Yeah, I've thought about this before. I'm in favor of it. >> >> Great! Anyone else? >> >> Btw, I've noticed many authors don't know what interpolation means, >>even native English speakers, so perhaps we need a different name than >>interpolate(). I've thought of combine() but it doesn't make sense for >>e.g. lengths. Definitely not cross-fade() though, that's confusing even >>for images (for which it was designed). > >More synonyms for combine() could be blend() or mix(). Given the mix-blend-mode property I'm not sure either of these would clarify things.
Received on Wednesday, 4 December 2013 18:19:56 UTC