- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:10:32 +1200
- To: Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>
- Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Thursday, 15 August 2013 22:10:59 UTC
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>wrote: > For such a use case, have you considered paged overflow [1][2]? > Paged overflow would work for that one use case but it's more work to implement and less applicable to other similar use-cases (when multiple items fit into the container), so I don't want to go that way. Rob -- Jtehsauts tshaei dS,o n" Wohfy Mdaon yhoaus eanuttehrotraiitny eovni le atrhtohu gthot sf oirng iyvoeu rs ihnesa.r"t sS?o Whhei csha iids teoa stiheer :p atroa lsyazye,d 'mYaonu,r "sGients uapr,e tfaokreg iyvoeunr, 'm aotr atnod sgaoy ,h o'mGee.t" uTph eann dt hwea lmka'n? gBoutt uIp waanndt wyeonut thoo mken.o w * *
Received on Thursday, 15 August 2013 22:10:59 UTC