"Gérard Talbot" <www-style@gtalbot.org> writes: > Morten, > > I have split this test into 2 sub-tests: > > http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3Multi-Columns/Opera/Nested-multicol-fill-auto-M-Stenshorne.xht > > http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3Multi-Columns/Opera/Nested-multicol-fill-balance-M-Stenshorne.xht Nice. > IE 10 renders > > http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/CSS3Multi-Columns/Opera/Nested-multicol-fill-auto-M-Stenshorne.xht > > like this: > > aaa eee | iii > bbb fff | jjj > ccc ggg | kkk > ddd hhh | lll IE's multicol implementation rocks! >>>but I cannot test that browser right now. > > Morten, for IE10, you can try > http://netrenderer.com/index.php > or > http://browsershots.org/ Sweet! I'll start using those, rather than firing up VirtualBox every time. :) Thanks! >>> I've asked Hakom a similar question on July 21st and he answered: >>> >>> { >>> If height [of a multi-column element] is auto, [then column-fill:] >>> 'auto' >>> and [column-fill:] 'balance' should produce the same result. >> >> That's only for continuous media, I think. The inner multicol is kind of >> in paged media, and my main point is that column-fill:auto is meaningful >> here. column-fill:auto should only be dishonored if the column heights >> are truly unconstrained > > Then, there is some vague issue with this in the spec. How and when a > column box height is truly unconstrained. I agree with you that in such > test, Nested-multicol-fill-auto-M-Stenshorne.xht , it should be filled > *_not_* in a balanced manner. Yes, the spec should probably define what "the length of columns has been constrained" means exactly. Is this constrained? <div style="max-height:40000000000mm; columns:3; column-fill:auto;"></div> -- ---- Morten Stenshorne, developer, Opera Software ASA ---- ------------------ http://www.opera.com/ -----------------Received on Sunday, 11 August 2013 18:13:24 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:30 UTC