We've gone back and forth over the history of the spec over whether to call abspos children of a flex container "flex items" or not (settling on calling them flex items). It looks like this confused us when we were writing the "Flex Baselines" section, because it doesn't distinguish between in-flow and out-of-flow flex items. Obviously, the intent is to use the first *in-flow* flex item whenever it mentions a flex item, so we need to go amend that. I should make sure that we're not accidentally including out-of-flow flex items anywhere else where it's inappropriate, either. ~TJReceived on Friday, 28 September 2012 22:55:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:14:20 UTC