- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:55:53 -0700
- To: "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
- Cc: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>, Rudolph Gottesheim <r.gottesheim@loot.at>, Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>, WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 4:52 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kanghaol@oupeng.com> wrote: > (12/10/10 4:21), Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: >>> http://jsfiddle.net/GgzGf/6/ >>> >>> If a percentage height doesn't apply (e.g. because it's standards mode and >>> the containing block is auto-sized), should stretch apply to that flex item? >>> >>> Currently in WebKit and, per the flexbox spec, it does not. I don't feel >>> strongly either way. Just want to confirm that this is the desired behavior. >> >> Actually, according to 2.1 >> <http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#the-height-property>, a >> non-resolvable percentage height should *compute* to auto, which means >> that "stretch" should apply to it. > > Oh, please. I recall this issue come up multiple times already... let me > browse my www-style archive... > > Here you go: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Oct/0712 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Sep/thread#msg8 > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0080 > > Can we do something about this? > > (I have no idea what this thread is about. But seeing this again makes > me cry.) Sigh, got it. I can't keep track of all the errata; this stuff needs to be *in-document* if we expect anyone to pay attention to it. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2012 17:56:40 UTC