- From: Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu <kanghaol@oupeng.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 19:52:45 +0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>, Rudolph Gottesheim <r.gottesheim@loot.at>, Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>, WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
(12/10/10 4:21), Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote: >> http://jsfiddle.net/GgzGf/6/ >> >> If a percentage height doesn't apply (e.g. because it's standards mode and >> the containing block is auto-sized), should stretch apply to that flex item? >> >> Currently in WebKit and, per the flexbox spec, it does not. I don't feel >> strongly either way. Just want to confirm that this is the desired behavior. > > Actually, according to 2.1 > <http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/visudet.html#the-height-property>, a > non-resolvable percentage height should *compute* to auto, which means > that "stretch" should apply to it. Oh, please. I recall this issue come up multiple times already... let me browse my www-style archive... Here you go: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Oct/0712 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Sep/thread#msg8 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Feb/0080 Can we do something about this? (I have no idea what this thread is about. But seeing this again makes me cry.) Cheers, Kenny -- Web Specialist, Oupeng Browser, Beijing Try Oupeng: http://www.oupeng.com/
Received on Tuesday, 16 October 2012 11:53:25 UTC