- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 09:00:10 -0700
- To: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr> wrote: > Some editor’s drafts like css3-content [1] have a big red "Obsoletion > Notice" explaining that the module is not maintained and should not be used > for implementation. > > However the working draft on /TR [2] has no such indication. Apart from the > date in 2003, it has nothing suggesting that it is any less current that > another WD like css3-transforms. > > This information is also available in the notes of the current-work page > [3], but it really should be in the WDs themselves too (and preferably very > visible, like ind the EDs). Last year I started using css3-box myself for > implementing WeasyPrint before I was told on this list that I really > shouldn’t. > > [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-content/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-content/ > [3] http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work I tried to get new WDs published of all our obsolete drafts, but there was some pushback, and I didn't try very hard. I'd be happy to pick up the effort again. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 5 October 2012 16:00:57 UTC