- From: Simon Sapin <simon.sapin@kozea.fr>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:47:01 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
Hi, Some editor’s drafts like css3-content [1] have a big red "Obsoletion Notice" explaining that the module is not maintained and should not be used for implementation. However the working draft on /TR [2] has no such indication. Apart from the date in 2003, it has nothing suggesting that it is any less current that another WD like css3-transforms. This information is also available in the notes of the current-work page [3], but it really should be in the WDs themselves too (and preferably very visible, like ind the EDs). Last year I started using css3-box myself for implementing WeasyPrint before I was told on this list that I really shouldn’t. [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-content/ [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-content/ [3] http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work -- Simon Sapin
Received on Friday, 5 October 2012 14:47:27 UTC