[CSSWG] Missing obsoletion notices on /TR


Some editor’s drafts like css3-content [1] have a big red "Obsoletion 
Notice" explaining that the module is not maintained and should not be 
used for implementation.

However the working draft on /TR [2] has no such indication. Apart from 
the date in 2003, it has nothing suggesting that it is any less current 
that another WD like css3-transforms.

This information is also available in the notes of the current-work page 
[3], but it really should be in the WDs themselves too (and preferably 
very visible, like ind the EDs). Last year I started using css3-box 
myself for implementing WeasyPrint before I was told on this list that I 
really shouldn’t.

[1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-content/
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-content/
[3] http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/current-work

Simon Sapin

Received on Friday, 5 October 2012 14:47:27 UTC