- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 16:21:30 -0700
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
So the CSSWG agreed last week to pursue a common alignment property model, based on the "Box Alignment" proposal I posted to the list a few weeks ago. This thread is on what names to use on each of the properties. Let's make this quick, so we can use those names for Flexbox alignment! http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-align/ Fundamentally, we're breaking down the properties along two axes: * in which dimension are things being shifted? There are two: X) inline (main) Y) stacking (cross) * what's being aligned within what? A) element itself within its containing block B) element's contents within itself C) element's child items within their container The last concept's a bit tricky: it exists due to 'flex-align', which sets the default cross-alignment (i.e. interpretation of 'flex-item-align: auto') for the child flex items. This is different from B), which for Flexbox aligns the entire stack of lines within the flex container (i.e. 'flex-line-pack'). For a grid container, it would set the default alignment of each grid item within its slot--as opposed to the alignment of the grid within the grid element (if the grid is smaller than the grid element). The idea is to control, as a set, all the children whose alignment container is not the element itself, but some intermediate structure. On to the candidates! I have collected three sets, which you can mix and match, below. (They are also listed in the draft.) Set 1: Box/Content/Default +--------X----------------Y------ A | box-justify box-align B | content-justify content-align C | default-justify default-align Set 2: Self/Content/Item +--------X----------------Y------ A | self-justify self-align B | content-justify content-align C | item-justify item-align Set 3: Outside/Inside/Items +--------X----------------Y------ A | justify-outside align-outside B | justify-inside align-inside C | justify-items align-items What do you think works best? Why? Do you have another suggestion? p.s. If you want nicer typesetting of this issue, there's this overview: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-align/#overview Further background is available in this email, which formed the basis for the Box Alignment draft: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0743.html ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 03:56:19 UTC