- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 08:52:44 +0200
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: Daniel Holbert <dholbert@mozilla.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:15 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > On 5/12/12 5:49 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> Luckily, the issue here with not knowing whether a child is an item or >> not has been resolved > > That's not the point. The point is that defining computation differently > for flexbox items and non-flexbox items complicates implementations (and > will significantly complicate the spec, I suspect). Is there a benefit to > doing it that way? If not, then just do the simpler thing which uniformly > computes 'auto' to the flex-align of the parent (modulo the root element > issue). Ah, yes, I could do that here. I can't give the same uniform treatment to 'flex-basis', unfortunately, because it depends on which direction the main axis points, and if you're not in a flexbox you don't have a main axis. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 06:53:33 UTC