- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sun, 13 May 2012 03:42:37 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 05/11/2012 06:18 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Morten Stenshorne<mstensho@opera.com> wrote: >> Should the 'overflow' property apply to flexboxes? Implementations do >> support it, and I think it makes sense to do so. >> >> However, the flexbox spec (20120510) says that "Flexboxes are not block >> containers", and CSS21 says that 'overflow' applies to block containers >> only. >> >> BTW: When it comes to "the other non-block container thing", namely >> tables, it looks like we have all agreed to honor overflow:hidden, while >> overflow:scroll and overflow:auto are treated as overflow:visible... > > CSS21 needs fixing there. Anton, fantasai, you led me astray! Y'all > told me that it doesn't make sense to call it a block context! Because it isn't! You aren't formatting flexbox items as block flow. We could say "block containers and boxes that estabish a formatting context", but I'm not sure how that interacts with tables. The table box presumably establishes a table formatting context. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 14 May 2012 03:56:01 UTC