- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 07:40:02 -0700
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: >> 1. Some people don't like having id selectors refer to out-of-document >> elements, as it's inconsistent with how the same selector would work >> in other contexts. > > In the original proposal this wasn't a problem since it wasn't an ID > selector per se, just a name that could be resolved using the dedicated > element map or falling back to the id map. So the fact that it looked exactly like an id selector was accidental. ^_^ >> My proposal is to drop all references to this ability for now, and >> resolve these issues either in Images 4 or another spec like CSSOM. >> I'd remove all references to out-of-document elements from the spec. >> This still leaves in useful abilities, like the ability to use a >> non-rendered element; it would just require putting the element into >> the document and giving it display:none. > > Actually this does remove some power: now you can only render elements in > the same document. Previously you could render elements in other documents, > which has some use-cases, e.g. rendering the contents of IFRAMEs without > clipping to the IFRAME element to make live thumbnails of Web pages. > (Perhaps more useful in browser extensions than on the public Web.) I know this removes some power, but not enough to cripple the feature. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2012 14:40:55 UTC