Re: [css3-gcpm] Content templates

On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Christoph Päper
<christoph.paeper@crissov.de> wrote:
> Tab Atkins Jr.:
>> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:22 AM, Christoph Päper
>>>
>>> Selectors in values are always a bad idea.
>>
>> There are specific reasons the group has avoided selectors in values (mainly just complexity concerns), but that doesn't make them "always a bad idea".
>
> Complexity,

Is it complex to create clone of exists DOM tree and apply rules to it?

> circular dependencies,

Restrict content templates inside used template.

> recursion

Fixed by previous rule.

> that it is a bad idea.

Why?

-- 
s0rr0w

Received on Tuesday, 27 March 2012 14:35:58 UTC