- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:28:17 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 3/4/12 10:47 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> Good point. "<el style='foo'>...</el>" can be thought of as a
> shorthand for "<el><style scoped>:scope { foo }</style></el>"
Except for the fact that it has totally different cascading behavior,
right? Though it's not clear to me whether the cascading behavior of
<style scoped> is the right one... It would make somewhat more sense if
it cascaded in a separate level similar to inline style, I think.
The other thing to keep in mind when changing what @style does is that
this is one of the few cases where the CSSOM is _very_ widely used.
Which means that how all this stuff is exposed to the CSSOM becomes very
important in terms of evaluating the impact of the change.
-Boris
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 15:28:55 UTC