- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:14:07 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org
Le 06/03/12 08:52, Alexander Shpack a écrit :
> & notation is not clear, imo. I think, the possibility to write a
> usual styles is better. Authors may use "this" keyword for defining
> style context
>
> <a href=”#” style=”this {color: blue;} this:hover { color: red; };
> this::before { content: '+'}”>
> a link that doesn’t follow traditionnal look&feel of links in the site
> </a>
In. One. Word : _never_. Sorry :-)
CSS also applies to XML where elements _can_ be named <this>.
I think & is clear enough for the time being. This proposal just
appeared on our radar and we have time to refine it. The syntax,
namely the one-char descriptor we're going to use, is certainly
note the most complex issue here so let's focus on what really
matters instead of diverging entirely.
On another note - and that's not for you Alexander but for everyone
here - contributing to a technical discussion is fine; keeping a
thread active beyond a firm and stable refusal by the editors is
just noise and a waste of time for everyone. Thanks.
</Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 15:15:30 UTC