- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 16:11:33 -0700
- To: Elliott Sprehn <esprehn@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 07/25/2012 03:39 PM, Elliott Sprehn wrote: > Now that both Webkit and Gecko have implementations of min-content, max-content, fill-available and fit-content for width (and > neither for height), I propose we unprefix the keywords for width. > > Note: Gecko unfortunately implemented an older spec as -moz-available instead of -moz-fill-available, so unprefixing should > also bring both Gecko and Webkit into alignment. > > Does anyone have any objections? Yes. The behavior of 'width' is that of the 'height' property in vertical writing modes, so until that's also implemented and interoperable, I don't think it's a good idea to remove the prefixes. In particular, behavior for 'fill-available' has been requested to change in the logical height dimension, and that's not even specced yet. Note that while Gecko doesn't implement vertical text, Webkit does. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 25 July 2012 23:12:00 UTC