- From: Scott Johnson <sjohnson@mozilla.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:40:40 -0500
- To: www-style@w3.org
- CC: Robert O'Callahan <rocallahan@gmail.com>
Hello www-style: Robert O'Callahan and I have been discussing the case regarding balancing in a multi-column set after a column has an element that we aren't able to break, and is too large for one of its columns, such as an image. Consider the case I present at http://people.mozilla.org/~sjohnson/b764567/columnfill-nonbreak-img.html It is essentially a three-column set, with an image in the first column that is too large vertically to fit in the column, and then (about) two lines of text. The question I have for the list is whether or not these two lines of text should balance across the remaining columns, since column-fill: balance is specified. In most UAs that I have tested thus far (including Opera, Webkit-, and Gecko-based), it seems that the balancing is terminated, and we revert to column-fill: auto behavior after the large image overflows the bounds of the first column. If we look at another case, http://people.mozilla.org/~sjohnson/b764567/columnfill-nonbreak-img-2.html where the non-breakable element (the image) is in the middle frame, should the two columns to the left and right be balanced? Robert and I agree that columns in these cases should probably be balanced, but I wanted to get the opinion of the list members as well, as this might require changes to existing column code. Thanks, -- ~Scott
Received on Friday, 13 July 2012 16:41:09 UTC