- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:03:54 -0800
- To: Daniel Tan <lists@NOVALISTIC.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Thursday 2012-01-12 04:41 +0800, Daniel Tan wrote: > Last I heard, it sort of got cut due to implementation headaches > of some sort, related to performance, nesting and so on. I'm quite > curious; could somebody elaborate on this for me? I think one of the reasons was also that the exact behavior was never really defined, and it wasn't clear what it should be. In particular, the open questions I had are described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Oct/0268.html . -David -- 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2012 23:04:31 UTC