Re: [css3-transforms] Extending CSSOM interface

Would there be a replacement of CSSValue? I have nothing in mind if CSSTransformValue gets renamed into CSSTransform and doesn't inherit from CSSValue at all.

Dirk

On Feb 16, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug wrote:

> On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:43:05 +0100, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>  
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Aryeh,
>> 
>> On Feb 16, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Aryeh Gregor wrote:
>> 
>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>  
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi www-style,
>>>> 
>>>> I would like to see some changes to the current interfaces of CSS  
>>>> Transforms. This is also described in the Wiki "Merged Transforms"[0].  
>>>> Currently CSS Transforms specifies 'CSSMatrix' and 'CSSTransformValue'.
>>> 
>>> But it defines no way to obtain either type of object:
>>> 
>>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15443
>>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16003
>> At least for WebKit and Mozilla there is a way to get them:  
>> getPropertyCSSValue(). It should be the biggest concern of CSSOM to  
>> address that! In the meantime we can specify the interfaces and make  
>> sure that they work when all browsers support either getPropertyCSSValue  
>> or another way to access it from CSSOM.
> 
> I think this stuff has already been obsoleted, and that this was why most  
> of it (except CSSMatrix for some reason, though there was no way to  
> retrieve it) was removed, from the CSSWG 2d draft, at least.
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Oct/0011.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Sep/0120.html
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Oct/0347.html
> 
> -- 
> Øyvind Stenhaug
> Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
> 

Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 18:58:42 UTC