RE: Transforms specs

Hi David, Simon,

@David, as said in an earlier email, we had a resolution to add notes to deprecate the following specs (http://dev.w3.org/SVG/modules/transforms/SVGTransforms.html, http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-2d-transforms/ and http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-3d-transforms/ ). The notes have been added. We had a resolution to republish them. They should be published now.

@Simon, you're right, the right spec is http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transforms/ but I thought it would be a common spec between CSS and SVG, some sort of "W3C Web Transforms" with a common model (possibly syntax) for CSS and SVG.

Cyril

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Fraser [mailto:simon.fraser@apple.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 9 February 2012 10:47 PM
> To: L. David Baron
> Cc: www-style@w3.org; public-fx@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Transforms specs
>
>
> On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:42 AM, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
>
> > As before [1], I'm lost in a maze of transform specs.
> >
> > There was an item yesterday on the CSS meeting agenda to obsolete
> > css3-2d-transforms and css3-3d-transforms with a merged transforms
> > spec, and Simon also said he'd been fixing 3-D issues in that merged
> > spec.  I was assuming that the spec being proposed as the replacement
> > spec was
> > http://dev.w3.org/Graphics-FX/modules/2D-transforms/spec/2DTransforms.

> > html
> > but I now realize it might be
> > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transforms/ .
> >
> > Which spec is the proposed replacement transforms spec?
>
> It's the csswg one. We should remove the GFX one.
>
> Simon
>
> >
> > -David
> >
> > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2011OctDec/0195.html

> >
> > --
> > 𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
> > 𝄢   Mozilla                           http://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
> >

The information contained in this email message and any attachments may be confidential and may also be the subject to legal professional privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, disclosure or copying of this material is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately advise the sender by return email and delete the information from your system.

Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 20:46:14 UTC