- From: Simon Fraser <simon.fraser@apple.com>
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:46:49 +0100
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:42 AM, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote: > As before [1], I'm lost in a maze of transform specs. > > There was an item yesterday on the CSS meeting agenda to obsolete > css3-2d-transforms and css3-3d-transforms with a merged transforms > spec, and Simon also said he'd been fixing 3-D issues in that merged > spec. I was assuming that the spec being proposed as the > replacement spec was > http://dev.w3.org/Graphics-FX/modules/2D-transforms/spec/2DTransforms.html > but I now realize it might be > http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transforms/ . > > Which spec is the proposed replacement transforms spec? It's the csswg one. We should remove the GFX one. Simon > > -David > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2011OctDec/0195.html > > -- > 𝄞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 𝄂 > 𝄢 Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ 𝄂 >
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 11:47:21 UTC