Re: Transforms specs

On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:42 AM, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:

> As before [1], I'm lost in a maze of transform specs.
> 
> There was an item yesterday on the CSS meeting agenda to obsolete
> css3-2d-transforms and css3-3d-transforms with a merged transforms
> spec, and Simon also said he'd been fixing 3-D issues in that merged
> spec.  I was assuming that the spec being proposed as the
> replacement spec was
> http://dev.w3.org/Graphics-FX/modules/2D-transforms/spec/2DTransforms.html
> but I now realize it might be
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transforms/ .
> 
> Which spec is the proposed replacement transforms spec?

It's the csswg one. We should remove the GFX one.

Simon

> 
> -David
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2011OctDec/0195.html
> 
> -- 
> 𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
> 𝄢   Mozilla                           http://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
> 

Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 11:47:21 UTC