- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 08:18:43 -0700
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Jens O. Meiert" <jens@meiert.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote: > Aside from that though, there is a good proposal on the table that, while it > has a few rough edges or things you could bikeshed on seems to have cleared > a lot of acceptance hurdles... what is the damning argument against it > really? Would something like this satisfy it? > > -x-foo: 25px; > width: val(-x-foo); No damning argument, only that it's basically exactly the same as the current spec, but with very slightly different names, and I like my names better. ^_^ ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 30 August 2012 15:19:35 UTC