- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 14:01:50 +0200
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Cc: Koji Ishii <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>, W3C Style <www-style@w3.org>, "public-i18n-cjk@w3.org" <public-i18n-cjk@w3.org>, ML public-i18n-core (public-i18n-core@w3.org) <public-i18n-core@w3.org>
Glenn Adams, Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:54:56 +0800: > > It is not intended to redefine content language. To make this clear, a > slight improvement would be: > >> <quote> >> A phrase of the form "known to be X" where X is a language >> name, e.g., "known to be Japanese", is intended to be determined >> using the <a href="#content-language">content language</a> alone, and > does not imply a requirement to perform >> linguistic analysis (i.e., language recognition) of associated text >> content." >> </quote> In theory, the host document/language could require UA to perform linguistic analysis/recognition. Why not refine the comment to say that the UA «must determine the language according to the rules of the host language and that for XML and HTML5, this precludes linguistic analysis" - etc. -- leif halvard silli
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2012 12:02:30 UTC