- From: Gérard Talbot <www-style@gtalbot.org>
- Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 23:22:57 -0400
- To: "Public www-style mailing list" <www-style@w3.org>
Dear fellow www-style colleagues, http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/overflow-applies-to-007a.xht Is this test correct? All browsers are failing this test, as coded. So, am I missing something here? ---------- I believe this test http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/nightly-unstable/html4/overflow-applies-to-007.htm to be imprecise (or not best) as there is no width set to the table-cell element. Am I wrong? (Additionally, height: 5em on the table element is extraneous, unneeded, unnecessary but that's not my nr 1 issue with that test.) Gérard P.S.: I've read the bug reports https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15381 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17122 -- CSS 2.1 Test suite RC6, March 23rd 2011 http://test.csswg.org/suites/css2.1/20110323/html4/toc.html Contributions to CSS 2.1 test suite http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/ Web authors' contributions to CSS 2.1 test suite http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/web-authors-contributions-css21-testsuite.html
Received on Friday, 10 August 2012 03:23:26 UTC