On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Behnam Esfahbod ZWNJ <behnam@zwnj.org> wrote: > The square-box-and-fill model works better with the "object-fit" > property and it's "fill" value. In fact, having a solution based on > the object-fit property, there is the possibility to support yet a few > more methods, like "cover", which is also impossible to implement > using the current features. Also, note that "object-fit: contain" is > equivalent to "45deg" or "135deg". Are there any use-cases for such things? They definitely *could* be done, but I cant' think of any reason why you'd want to. It would be equivalent to you just specifying an angle directly (something of the form n*90deg + 45deg), with a bit of a scale thrown in. ~TJReceived on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 20:37:40 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:02 UTC