- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:36:50 -0700
- To: Behnam Esfahbod ZWNJ <behnam@zwnj.org>
- Cc: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, WWW-Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Behnam Esfahbod ZWNJ <behnam@zwnj.org> wrote: > The square-box-and-fill model works better with the "object-fit" > property and it's "fill" value. In fact, having a solution based on > the object-fit property, there is the possibility to support yet a few > more methods, like "cover", which is also impossible to implement > using the current features. Also, note that "object-fit: contain" is > equivalent to "45deg" or "135deg". Are there any use-cases for such things? They definitely *could* be done, but I cant' think of any reason why you'd want to. It would be equivalent to you just specifying an angle directly (something of the form n*90deg + 45deg), with a bit of a scale thrown in. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 20:37:40 UTC