- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 13:42:53 -0700
- To: Behnam Esfahbod ZWNJ <behnam@zwnj.org>
- Cc: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, WWW-Style <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:59 PM, Behnam Esfahbod ZWNJ <behnam@zwnj.org> wrote: > Tab, I used "magic" only as a place-holder. In my implementation I > used "-v", like "bottom-right" and "bottom-right-v". I don't like the > idea of publicizing any magical behaviour too. Right, I didn't think you were serious about a "magic" keyword being used. It was obviously just a placeholder. ^_^ What I mean by "magical" behavior is that it's non-obvious. I think it would be confusing to have the gradient claim it's going between two corners, but actually angle itself in a different direction. I had a similar problem with Brad's original "as-square" keyword, since it only adjusted the angle of the gradient-line. I think it's simpler and easier for authors to understand if the transformation happens at the very end, so you can think of the gradient being drawn as normal into a square, and then being stretched. That gives you a nice physical analog for what happens, whereas understanding the other approaches requires you to manipulate theoretical spec concepts. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 20:50:04 UTC