- From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 22:59:39 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Behnam Esfahbod ZWNJ <behnam@zwnj.org>
- CC: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, WWW-Style <www-style@w3.org>
Use case: Applying the same linear-gradient value for background-image across boxes of different aspect ratios. -----Original Message----- From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 1:37 PM To: Behnam Esfahbod ZWNJ Cc: Brian Manthos; Brad Kemper; WWW-Style Subject: Re: [css3-images] Gradient Magic On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:56 PM, Behnam Esfahbod ZWNJ <behnam@zwnj.org> wrote: > The square-box-and-fill model works better with the "object-fit" > property and it's "fill" value. In fact, having a solution based on > the object-fit property, there is the possibility to support yet a few > more methods, like "cover", which is also impossible to implement > using the current features. Also, note that "object-fit: contain" is > equivalent to "45deg" or "135deg". Are there any use-cases for such things? They definitely *could* be done, but I cant' think of any reason why you'd want to. It would be equivalent to you just specifying an angle directly (something of the form n*90deg + 45deg), with a bit of a scale thrown in. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 23:00:18 UTC