Tab, I used "magic" only as a place-holder. In my implementation I used "-v", like "bottom-right" and "bottom-right-v". I don't like the idea of publicizing any magical behaviour too. -Behnam On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote: >> I revisited Behnam's rendering and still believe it aligns with the angular specification directly. You're right thought that you have to use a different rectangle for than the original box. > [snip example] > > Yeah, using a box with the reversed ratio should be the same as > reflecting the angle over y=x or y=-x. > > I'm still strongly of the opinion that doing anything magical here is > a bad idea, and if we address this, it should be done via coordinate > spaces, as that's actually possible to explain to people ("you draw > the gradient into a square, and then stretch the square to fill the > canvas"). > > ~TJ > -- ' بهنام اسفهبد ' Behnam Esfahbod ' * .. http://behnam.esfahbod.info * ` * http://zwnj.org * o * 3E7F B4B6 6F4C A8AB 9BB9 7520 5701 CA40 259E 0F8BReceived on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 06:00:36 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:02 UTC