On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote: > I revisited Behnam's rendering and still believe it aligns with the angular specification directly. You're right thought that you have to use a different rectangle for than the original box. [snip example] Yeah, using a box with the reversed ratio should be the same as reflecting the angle over y=x or y=-x. I'm still strongly of the opinion that doing anything magical here is a bad idea, and if we address this, it should be done via coordinate spaces, as that's actually possible to explain to people ("you draw the gradient into a square, and then stretch the square to fill the canvas"). ~TJReceived on Monday, 18 July 2011 22:44:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:08:02 UTC