- From: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 13:16:43 -0500
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Oct 25, 2010, at 5:17 PM, fantasai wrote: > On 10/25/2010 01:32 AM, John Daggett wrote: >> fantasai wrote: >> >>>> Looking over the current CSS3 Writing Modes spec, I'm puzzling over >>>> what writing-mode 'horizontal-bt' is needed for? It's defined as: >>>> >>>> "Bottom-to-top block flow. The writing mode is horizontal." >>>> >>>> What's the script that requires this? Or is it just there for >>>> completeness? >>>> >>>> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-writing-modes/#writing-mode >>> >>> It's just there for completeness. MS requested that such a mode exist >>> since they implement it (for completeness, and because given all the >>> other modes, they thought it was easy). >> >> If block-progression and direction are defined as in the IE Blog post, >> then I could see that it would fall out from having two independent >> properties. But with a single property, I don't think it's needed for >> completeness so I would suggest dropping it. It may be easy to >> implement but features that serve no purpose add time to testing >> and conformance requirements. > > I don't particularly care either way, but at this early stage in the > draft, I think it's better to leave it in. When we're closer to CR, > we can discuss what to keep and what to drop and what to mark at-risk. > I'm happy to mark it as an issue, though. > > I will say, Behdad's cell phone use case is interesting. There is really no reason to leave it out. Once you've abstracted your engine, horizontal-bt just comes along for free. dave (hyatt@apple.com)
Received on Tuesday, 26 October 2010 18:17:18 UTC