- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:17:54 -0700
- To: John Daggett <jdaggett@mozilla.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 10/25/2010 01:32 AM, John Daggett wrote: > fantasai wrote: > >>> Looking over the current CSS3 Writing Modes spec, I'm puzzling over >>> what writing-mode 'horizontal-bt' is needed for? It's defined as: >>> >>> "Bottom-to-top block flow. The writing mode is horizontal." >>> >>> What's the script that requires this? Or is it just there for >>> completeness? >>> >>> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-writing-modes/#writing-mode >> >> It's just there for completeness. MS requested that such a mode exist >> since they implement it (for completeness, and because given all the >> other modes, they thought it was easy). > > If block-progression and direction are defined as in the IE Blog post, > then I could see that it would fall out from having two independent > properties. But with a single property, I don't think it's needed for > completeness so I would suggest dropping it. It may be easy to > implement but features that serve no purpose add time to testing > and conformance requirements. I don't particularly care either way, but at this early stage in the draft, I think it's better to leave it in. When we're closer to CR, we can discuss what to keep and what to drop and what to mark at-risk. I'm happy to mark it as an issue, though. I will say, Behdad's cell phone use case is interesting. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 25 October 2010 22:18:29 UTC