- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:56:46 -0700
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: > Tab Atkins wrote: >> (b) is certainly how I expect this to work. > > It seems David and I agree that your expectation is contrary to the current > spec prose which actually calls for a) : > > # If a property is specified multiple times in the value of ‘transition-property’ > # (either on its own or via a shorthand that contains it), then the transition that > # starts uses the duration, delay, and timing function at the index corresponding to > # the last occurrence of the property. > > Note the "(either on its own or via a shorthand that contains it)" clause. This is what > WebKit does today afaict. I don't understand. Dbaron is saying that the current spec text suggests (b). I am supporting the same thing that dbaron appears to be. > The problem with b) is that we're saying two transitions may be running on the same > shorthand but I very much doubt that's desirable. I don't think we can or should > collapse duplicates in some cases and not others. I'm sorry, but I can't understand this paragraph at all. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 25 October 2010 21:57:40 UTC