- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:47:19 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
> From: Tab Atkins Jr. [mailto:jackalmage@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 2:21 PM > To: Simon Fraser > Cc: Sylvain Galineau; www-style list > Subject: Re: [css3-transitions] shorthand/longhand handling in > transition property > > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > > On Oct 22, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > > > > The current Editor's Draft [1] defines both the following rules: > > > > # If one of the identifiers listed is a shorthand property, > implementations > > # must start transitions for any of its longhand sub-properties that > are > > animatable, > > # using the duration, delay, and timing function at the index > corresponding > > to the > > # shorthand. > > > > # If a property is specified multiple times in the value of > > 'transition-property' > > # (either on its own or via a shorthand that contains it), then the > > transition that > > # starts uses the duration, delay, and timing function at the index > > corresponding to > > # the last occurrence of the property. > > > > What seems undefined is whether the following results in a duplicate: > > > > transition-property: border-width, border-right-width; > > transition-duration: 3s, 1s; > > > > In other words, should this be equivalent to (a): > > > > transition-property: border-top-width, border-bottom-width, > > border-left-width, border-right-width; > > transition-duration: 3s, 3s, 3s, 1s; > > > > Or (b): > > > > transition-property: border-top-width, border-right-width, > > border-bottom-width, border-left-width, border-right-width; > > transition-duration: 3s, 3s, 3s, 3s, 1s; > > > > Agreed that the spec needs to clarify this, and behavior (b) probably > makes > > most sense. > > (b) is certainly how I expect this to work. It seems David and I agree that your expectation is contrary to the current spec prose which actually calls for a) : # If a property is specified multiple times in the value of ‘transition-property’ # (either on its own or via a shorthand that contains it), then the transition that # starts uses the duration, delay, and timing function at the index corresponding to # the last occurrence of the property. Note the "(either on its own or via a shorthand that contains it)" clause. This is what WebKit does today afaict. The problem with b) is that we're saying two transitions may be running on the same shorthand but I very much doubt that's desirable. I don't think we can or should collapse duplicates in some cases and not others.
Received on Monday, 25 October 2010 21:47:55 UTC