- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:21:18 -0700
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Cc: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > On Oct 22, 2010, at 3:04 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > > The current Editor's Draft [1] defines both the following rules: > > # If one of the identifiers listed is a shorthand property, implementations > # must start transitions for any of its longhand sub-properties that are > animatable, > # using the duration, delay, and timing function at the index corresponding > to the > # shorthand. > > # If a property is specified multiple times in the value of > 'transition-property' > # (either on its own or via a shorthand that contains it), then the > transition that > # starts uses the duration, delay, and timing function at the index > corresponding to > # the last occurrence of the property. > > What seems undefined is whether the following results in a duplicate: > > transition-property: border-width, border-right-width; > transition-duration: 3s, 1s; > > In other words, should this be equivalent to (a): > > transition-property: border-top-width, border-bottom-width, > border-left-width, border-right-width; > transition-duration: 3s, 3s, 3s, 1s; > > Or (b): > > transition-property: border-top-width, border-right-width, > border-bottom-width, border-left-width, border-right-width; > transition-duration: 3s, 3s, 3s, 3s, 1s; > > Agreed that the spec needs to clarify this, and behavior (b) probably makes > most sense. (b) is certainly how I expect this to work. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 25 October 2010 21:22:11 UTC