On Oct 22, 2010, at 4:28 PM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > Following up on http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Aug/0109.html. > > I was wondering if we could resolve this pending issue. I'm leaning towards David's > proposal i.e. the transition-property list defined the length to which other > transition-* properties are truncated or repeated, as is done for background-* > property by background-image. I think this is fine. > Given that duplicate properties are handled on > a last-one-wins basis, repeating the transition-property list itself seems less > desirable and more prone to causing unwelcome surprises. I'm not sure what you mean by "repeating the transition-property list itself". Simon
Received on Monday, 25 October 2010 21:20:43 UTC