- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:52:29 +0000
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E2810CCAB@TK5EX14MBXC120.redmond.corp.microsoft.>
> From: L. David Baron [mailto:dbaron@dbaron.org] > I think that should be considered duplication of border-right-width. > I think the "(either on its own or via a shorthand that contains > it)" makes the spec reasonably clear that that's the case. That was my reading as well. > > > In other words, should this be equivalent to (a): > > > > transition-property: border-top-width, border-bottom-width, border- > left-width, border-right-width; > > transition-duration: 3s, 3s, 3s, 1s; > > > > Or (b): > > > > transition-property: border-top-width, border-right-width, border- > bottom-width, border-left-width, border-right-width; > > transition-duration: 3s, 3s, 3s, 3s, 1s; > > The latter, although I don't see how the difference is detectable. If you always treat it as a duplicate then the last specified duration applies to border-right-width regardless of the ordering of transition-property. If you don't treat it as a duplicate then the duration for border-right-width depends on where it is in the list and/or you may end up with odd repetitions. You can try the attached testcase in Firefox 4 vs. Chrome 7. > > -David > > -- > L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ > Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Attachments
- text/html attachment: css3.transitions.testing.html
Received on Friday, 22 October 2010 22:53:07 UTC