- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:51:07 -0800
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Friday 2010-01-29 10:05 -0600, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > > No, the transition properties are taken from the destination style. > > Wow, that's *completely* unclear, and also different from what I had > gathered from examples used on the mailing list. Yeah, in that case > examples are *absolutely required*, since there's no mention of that > anywhere in the spec and it runs contrary to what I would have > thought. Hmmm. I attempted to explain that in the spec when I wrote: # When the value of an animatable property changes, # implementations must decide what transitions to start based on # the values of the ‘transition-property’, ‘transition-duration’, # ‘transition-timing-function’, and ‘transition-delay’ properties # at the time of the change. Since this specification does not # define what property changes are considered simultaneous, # authors should be aware that changing any of the transition # properties a small amount of time after making a change that # might transition can result in behavior that varies between # implementations, since the changes might be considered # simultaneous in some implementations but not others. In the new "Starting of Transitions" section. However, rereading it, I now realize that "at the time of the change" is not clear at all. What I meant to say is probably "at the time that would be immediately after the change if no transitions had been specified". Does that make it clearer? -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Friday, 29 January 2010 17:51:36 UTC