- From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:28:05 +0100
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Bruno Fassino wrote: > On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 5:36 PM, Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net> wrote: > >> (although I think the phrase "these >> margins" could more explicitly refer back to the margins discussed two >> paragraphs earlier, as I now interpret it to). > > I too think that part of the difficulties in interpreting 9.5.2 point > 2 arise from that phrase "these margins", and from the fact that it is > followed by a bulleted list of margins not exactly matching the more > generic "previous adjacent margins" mentioned earlier in the > hypothetical position determination. Indeed, and even if it were clear what "these margins" referred to, there is no indication in the spec of if/when the first in-flow child's top margin should eventually be collapsed with its parent's (the clear's) top margin (neither in 9.5.2 nor in 8.3.1). Cheers, Anton Prowse http://dev.moonhenge.net
Received on Tuesday, 26 January 2010 18:29:17 UTC