- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 14:43:12 -0400
- To: Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 8/22/10 4:49 AM, Peter Moulder wrote: > On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 09:25:53PM -0400, Boris Zbarsky wrote: >> On 8/13/10 9:55 PM, Peter Moulder wrote: >>> And I'm actually inclined to think that if we're choosing what the text should >>> specify, then red is actually the behaviour that we want to specify: from what >>> I've considered so far, I think it best if inheritance is based on the true >>> document tree, and that we make the 5.12.1 text restrict itself to describing >>> the formatting within the first line box. >> >> That doesn't work unless you define inheritance differently for >> in-flows and out-of-flows or something.... I'm not sure you want to >> go there. > > I was proposing that inheritance is determined by the document tree > (just as cascade.html currently says) and that there be an additional level of > "inheritance"-like behaviour for boxes placed in a certain line box, comparable > to how "The properties of anonymous boxes are inherited from the enclosing > non-anonymous box" (section 9.2.1.1). That involves pretty much redefining how first-line works completely, right? That might be ok, but I'd need to see a specific proposal to evaluate it. It definitely doesn't sound like a smaller implementation burden than just using the existing inheritance mechnism. -Boris
Received on Sunday, 22 August 2010 18:43:40 UTC