- From: David Perrell <davidp@hpaa.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:59:39 -0700
- To: "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
Brad Kemper wrote: | I feel that the emphasis for CSS gradient "images" should be on the | commonest cases, written simply, with little (if any) special magic | for how they repeat in backgrounds. It seems to me that endlessly | repeating radial gradients would be pretty uncommon, and should be | left to SVG for that. If gradient is an image type in CSS, it should | just behave like an image. In the case of a radial gradient, the simplest case would be circular, with nothing but color stops, the last of which defines the encompassing square. Dimensions would be decimal numbers from 0 to 1. The gradient would be considered to have no intrinsic width or height, so it would be sized by default to fill the background positioning area (an elliptical gradient when width != height). Repeating a small-sized gradient could be used for a polka-dot background or a soft-dotted line. Should there be a means to name (and cache) a gradient 'generated image' for reuse? If I have a class that uses the same gradient throughout a website, might it not be counter-productive, relative to a cached image file, to have the gradient reconstructed at each occurance? David Perrell
Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 16:00:36 UTC