- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:25:03 -0700
- To: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Håkon Wium Lie wrote: > I've added a description of the page/pages counters to GCPM: > > [1] http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-gcpm/#page-counters > > GCPM may be a better home for these if we want css3-page (where they > have been in the past [2][3]) to progress faster. However, I don't > feel strongly about where the description goes -- it's more imporant > that we agree on the behavior. > > [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-css3-page-20061010/#pg-based-extensions > [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/CR-css3-page-20040225/#pg-based-extensions > > Comments welcome. I'd rather keep the 'page' counter in css3-page. There's already a detailed discussion of page-based counters in the Editor's Draft. http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-page/#page-based-counters As for 'pages', I could go either way. We can add it to css3-page and mark it at-risk; that would be my preference. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2008 21:25:49 UTC