- From: Brad Kemper <brkemper@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 19:45:12 -0700
- To: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <60553F5E-01F7-4AC1-982D-92847DE4E192@comcast.net>
On May 15, 2008, at 5:57 PM, Alan Gresley wrote: >> Issue 32 refers to outer shadows (like with the current box-shadow >> or text-shadow), and whether or not the part covered by the glyph >> or box is drawn or not. With inner shadows, the shadow is not >> covered by the glyph or box. > > > Issue 32 is about box-shadow which it reads. > > Resolve: Box-shadows are only drawn outside the element's border-box. Fine. I will revise my statement then: Issue 32 refers to outer shadows (like with the current box-shadow draft), and whether or not the part covered by the box is drawn or not. With inner shadows, the shadow is not covered by the box. > Inner Box Shadow: > http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/44 ISSUE-44 > There have been quite a few comments about adding such a feature, > or at least an "inner glow" feature (which this would address). I really don't think that issue 44 is suggesting that an Inner Box shadow should be drawn outside of the box. That just wouldn't make sense. Therefore, issue 32 is only about "outer" shadows, as they currently exist in the spec. I take "drawn outside the element's border-box" to mean that it doesn't matter if the inside of the box is transparent or only partially opaque, because the (outer) shadows will not be drawn there. > You keep on intermingling box-shadow with text-shadow. As for text shadows, I quite clearly know which one I am talking about, and I often mention them together because the issues that have to do with one are very often relevant to the other. I am not that easily confused by having them mentioned together, but I will try to just talk about one at a time if you think that will help.
Received on Friday, 16 May 2008 03:00:49 UTC