- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 10:57:46 +1000
- To: Brad Kemper <brkemper@comcast.net>
- CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org
Brad Kemper wrote: > > On May 14, 2008, at 2:07 AM, Alan Gresley wrote: > >> >> fantasai wrote: >>> Inner Box Shadow: >>> http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Tracker/issues/44 ISSUE-44 >>> There have been quite a few comments about adding such a feature, >>> or at least an "inner glow" feature (which this would address). >> >> >> If an inner glow/shadow is added (ISSUE-44) to CSS3, the only place >> for the inner (whatever?) to be placed is inside the border-box. This >> box would have to have a transparent background but this could not >> happen if shadows were not allowed to be drawn inside the border-box >> (ISSUE-32). > > Issue 32 refers to outer shadows (like with the current box-shadow or > text-shadow), and whether or not the part covered by the glyph or box is > drawn or not. With inner shadows, the shadow is not covered by the glyph > or box. Issue 32 is about box-shadow which it reads. Resolve: Box-shadows are only drawn outside the element's border-box. Box-shadow is different from text-shadow since shadows with text-shadow are seen through transparent text. Seen in Safari. http://css-class.com/test/css/shadows/text-shadow1.htm You keep on intermingling box-shadow with text-shadow. All I have been referring to is about box-shadow since that what the two treads have been largely about. Even the subject line in each thread is box-shadow. When I talk of inner shadow, I only referring it to box-shadow. Alan
Received on Friday, 16 May 2008 01:10:27 UTC